Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jay Clarke vs Roberto Quiroz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Clarke vs Quiroz analysis and find out who is favored!
Jay Clarke vs Roberto Quiroz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Clarke 2 - 1 Quiroz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clarke has won 53.03% of points on his second serve, while Quiroz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clarke, in recent form, has won 55.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Quiroz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.55% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clarke has saved 59.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quiroz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clarke has won 73.13% of matches played (W/L 49/ 18), with Quiroz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clarke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 129/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 10/ 29). Quiroz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 134/ 103), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 30/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Clarke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.77% of matches (W/L 45/ 16), where as Quiroz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Clarke winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Clarke winning 5 and Quiroz winning 2. The last match between Clarke and Quiroz was at the Morelos Challenger, 29-04-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jay Clarke getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Clarke and Quiroz have played a deciding set 1 times, with Clarke winning 0 times and Quiroz 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Clarke winning 1, and Quiroz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clarke has played against opponents with an average rank of 198 while Quiroz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clarke has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quiroz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clarke has converted 47.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quiroz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Clarke 2 - 1 Quiroz
349
Rank
153
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
759
Rank
172
High
32
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (270-202)
Career Total W/L
54% (302-255)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$116,120
Career Prize Money
$98,220
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jay Clarke | Roberto Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 39 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:19 | 1:43:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (124/229) | 63% (142/226) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (86/124) | 68% (96/142) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (60/105) | 46% (39/84) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (10/26) | 50% (8/16) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (91/226) | 36% (83/229) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jay Clarke
Player
Roberto Quiroz
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Roberto Quiroz
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Jay Clarke
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
43%
(
42 of
97)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jay Clarke | Roberto Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (59/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (471/378) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (24/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 227.63 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1603/2710) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (1049/1603) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (569/1107) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (165/350) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1274/2805) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (24/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (26/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (24/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (24/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Jay Clarke
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
97%
(
35 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
51%
(
56 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
109
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Lorenzo Ferri
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Jay Clarke
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Jay Clarke
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
41%
(
27 of
66)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jay Clarke
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Quiroz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Roberto Quiroz
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Roberto Quiroz
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Roberto Quiroz
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Quiroz
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
1-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Roberto Quiroz
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Clarke Vs Quiroz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
